Pom wonderful vs coca cola ruling
WebJun 12, 2014 · A competitor of the Coca-Cola Company can bring a private lawsuit against the beverage giant over allegations of false advertising in a juice product, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday. WebApr 22, 2014 · In oral arguments yesterday, the Supreme Court tackled many of these issues in a dispute between POM Wonderful and Coca-Cola . The Court's ruling may touch upon …
Pom wonderful vs coca cola ruling
Did you know?
WebJun 18, 2012 · In Pom Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola., the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that federal false advertising law (the Lanham Act) does not permit private … WebPOM Wonderful believed this was deceptive advertising and filed a lawsuit against Coca-Cola. The company claimed Coca-Cola's promotional claims violated the Lanham Act as the name, label, marketing, and advertising of Coca-Cola's juice blend misled consumers as to its actual content, thereby causing POM to lose sales.
Web22 Mar 2016 --- Coca-Cola does not have to pay out $77.5 million to rival juice maker POM Wonderful for misleading advertising of its Minute Maid Pomegranate Blueberry Blend of … WebApr 5, 2016 · POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co., 134 S.Ct. 2228, 2231-32 (2014). Jury Trial on Merits. The Supreme Court remanded the case for further proceedings and …
WebMar 29, 2016 · March 29, 2016. Managing Intellectual Property. Despite winning a 2014 Supreme Court decision, POM Wonderful’s $77 million Lanham Act lawsuit against Coca-Cola recently came to an end when a Central District of California jury ruled that Coca-Cola’s Minute Maid pomegranate juice was not falsely advertised. In 2008, POM filed suit … WebMay 2, 2016 · POM Wonderful had sued Coca-Cola, which sold pomegranate blueberry juice under the Minute Maid brand, alleging that it shouldn’t be able to market drinks with just …
WebMay 5, 2010 · This matter is before the Court on Defendant The Coca Cola Company's (" Coca Cola" or " Defendant" ) Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, …
WebJun 17, 2014 · Breaking News: POM’s “David and Goliath” Victory over Coca-Cola By On 06/17/2014 29 Comments Last week’s Supreme Court ruling shows how federal agencies harass small food and supplement companies on labeling and advertising, but let industry favorites ignore or stretch the same rules. opel durmersheimWebMar 3, 2014 · POM Wonderful LLC brought this action against the Coca-Cola Company, stating a false-advertising claim under the Lanham Act, among other claims, alleging that … iowa gutter cleaningWebThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision to bar Pom Wonderful’s claim with respect to the name and labeling of Coca-Cola’s juice. It vacated … opel dealer galwayWebJun 12, 2014 · Coca-Cola Company makes a juice blend with a label that prominently displays the words "pomegranate" and "blueberry" but contains only 0.3 percent pomegranate juice and 0.2 percent blueberry juice. POM Wonderful brought a Lanham Act claim against Coca-Cola, alleging that Coca-Cola's label was deceptive and misleading … opel crossland x wymiaryWebJun 15, 2014 · On June 12, 2014, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision allowing the company to go ahead with the lawsuit. POM Wonderful stated that under the FDCA’s … opel crossland youtubeWebMay 17, 2012 · The court denied Coca-Cola s motion and ruled that Pom could conduct discovery to clarify which aspects of Coca-Cola s alleged conduct constituted labeling … iowa guthrie countyWebJun 12, 2014 · Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy didn’t mince words during oral arguments in April between Pom Wonderful and Coca-Cola. He said he found the labeling … opel crystal